哲学/心理/宗教领域需求澄清术语包（草案）
草稿，非正式模板
本包在上游标记为 draft，未作为可执行提示词收录，不代表专业意见或已核验建议。
原文
json
{
"schema_version": "1.0.0",
"package_id": "philosophy-psychology-religion-core",
"domain_id": "philosophy-psychology-religion",
"title": "哲学/心理/宗教领域需求澄清术语包（草案）",
"version": "0.1.0",
"status": "draft",
"intents": [
{
"id": "design",
"action": "设计",
"object": "哲学/心理/宗教相关产物"
},
{
"id": "diagnose",
"action": "排查",
"object": "哲学/心理/宗教相关问题"
}
],
"dimensions": [
{
"id": "scope",
"name": "问题与传统",
"definition": "问题与传统的可确认方向。",
"value_type": "selection"
},
{
"id": "method",
"name": "解释边界",
"definition": "解释边界的可确认方向。",
"value_type": "selection"
},
{
"id": "symptom",
"name": "问题现象",
"definition": "用户观察到的具体问题、时间、范围和影响。",
"value_type": "free_text"
}
],
"terms": [
{
"id": "core-1",
"term": "问题范围",
"plain_language": "明确讨论概念、经验、信仰或实践",
"benefit": "避免混淆问题",
"cost": "需要承认多种观点",
"dimension_id": "scope"
},
{
"id": "core-2",
"term": "理论传统",
"plain_language": "说明使用的学派、经典或研究框架",
"benefit": "讨论更有出处",
"cost": "不适合强行统一",
"dimension_id": "scope"
},
{
"id": "core-3",
"term": "事实观点区分",
"plain_language": "区分可验证事实、解释和价值判断",
"benefit": "减少过度推断",
"cost": "结论更谨慎",
"dimension_id": "scope"
},
{
"id": "core-4",
"term": "文化语境",
"plain_language": "说明语言、群体和历史背景",
"benefit": "降低误读",
"cost": "需要更多背景",
"dimension_id": "method"
},
{
"id": "core-5",
"term": "专业边界",
"plain_language": "区分哲学讨论、心理教育和临床判断",
"benefit": "避免越界建议",
"cost": "不能替代专业服务",
"dimension_id": "method"
}
],
"mappings": [
{
"expression": "专业一点/做好一点",
"level": "L3",
"intent_ids": [
"design"
],
"dimension_ids": [
"scope",
"method"
],
"reason": "需要先明确领域对象和方法约束。"
}
]
}